Iran, Ahmadinejad, Columbia, and the Right Wing
September 24, 2007
I’m having a right wing kind of day – I was just driving and listening to talk radio. It’s amazing how they control the dialogue and have commandeered just about every outlet. And the “left” responds within the framework that the right wingers construct.
Today Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is going to speak at Columbia University – it’s probably going on right now. It’s a smart move on his part. The U.S. noise machine has made him into a caricature, a demon, as they do so often with official state enemies. By coming here and talking, Ahmadinejad is going to confuse some people. They are going to find him reasonable and well-spoken, and able to stand up and defend himself and his country in the face of a torrent of right wing invective.
It won’t make a difference, of course. This is Monday. On Tuesday, the righties and the talking heads and canned voices will be back at it again. Ahmadinejad, the real person, will slip back into the shadows, and Ahmadinejad, the U.S.-created demon, will take center stage again.
I was remembering this morning an incident back in 1989. The U.S. was gearing up to attack Panama, but lacked a valid reason. President Manuel Noriega, a former CIA operative who had fallen into disfavor, gave a speech in that country in which he said that the climate was so poisoned that it was as if his country and ours were at war. U.S. headlines said “Noriega declares war on U.S.!” And indeed a war followed. We made sure of it.
The term “jingoism” was coined at the turn of the twentieth century to describe that kind of journalism. We’ve had quite a bit of it in our history.
So when I heard that Mahmoud Ahmadinejad had called for Israel to we wiped off the face of the map, I was suspicious. This could be American jingoists at work again.
It’s interesting. Indeed, he did give a speech. He said that “Zionism” is the West’s apparatus of political oppression against Muslims. He says the “Zionist regime” was imposed on the Islamic world as a way to ensure U.S. domination of the region and its assets. That’s pretty much true – the U.S. has supported the USS Israel all these years because Israel minds our business for us, using weapons we give them to police Arab (and Persian and Phoenician) peoples of the region. In return, we give Israel a free hand to do as they please with Palestinians or with real estate acquisitions. Quid pro quo. Ahmadinejad expressed hope that in the future the regime occupying Jerusalem should vanish from the page of time.
That’s aggressive, for sure, like Bush saying he wants regime change in Tehran. Only, we’re allowed to say such inflammatory things, they are not. And I note that Ahmadinejad used the word “Zionism”, which is the international political movement that was behind the creation of Israel. Broadly defined, it is the force behind Israel’s warlike foreign policy towards its neighbors, and oppression of Palestinians. But the State of Israel is a done deal – if Iran were to launch a scud missile in its direction, Iran would vanish.
So Ahmadinejad did call for regime change in Tel Aviv. But did he say he wanted to see Israel “wiped off the map”? That’s what has been reported here and repeated ad nauseum. No, he did not say that. That was an American Israeli invention. Propaganda works.
I’ve been watching closely, trying to figure out if the U.S. is going to attack Iran. They’ve no cause, of course, but that is of no matter. Prior to any attack there is always a demonization campaign, or “putting a face on the enemy”, as they say. It’s hard to hate a whole people, easy to hate an evil man. Ahmadinejad is our guy. Give a dog a bad name, then you can beat him.
I knew that Mahmoud Ahmadinejad was the object of scorn, but until listening to news and talk radio this morning, I was not aware of how effective the propaganda campaign has been. Right wingers are frothing. It’s ugly. Score another for the Bushies.
Some times the right wing in this country is a little more noisy and unreasonable than I can tolerate. Today is one of those days. This post qualifies as a rant. Today I’ve got no patience for righties. Don’t even try me.
September 24, 2007 at 3:23 pm
Kinda makes you miss the ol’ Pat Stinson days, doesn’t it.
September 24, 2007 at 3:42 pm
There’s a name I hadn’t thought of in years! How is he doing? I see he ran for office one time, with as much success as I had.
September 24, 2007 at 4:29 pm
[...] Found here. [...]
September 24, 2007 at 5:48 pm
Last I heard he’s testing sporting goods equipment for major outfitters and manufacturers so they can have the ‘tested in Montana’ label on them.
Ran in to an old listener the other day and he gave me a pristine, unworn ‘Up Front with Pat Stinson’ T-shirt. Classic collector’s item, I tell ya.
September 24, 2007 at 5:51 pm
The uproar over Ahmadinejad’s visit to the U.N. and his speeches in New York today remind me when Fidel Castro and Nikita Khrushchev were at the U.N. 47 years ago. The Shelburne Hotel in Manhattan demanded that the Cuban delegation advance $10,000 cash for their rooms. Castro responded by threatening to sleep in Central Park. Malcolm X intervened and arranged for Castro and company to stay at the Theresa Hotel in Harlem, where Castro received Khrushchev in his room. Eisenhower was in New York for the U.N. session, but refused to meet with either Castro or Khrushchev, saying they were “troublemakers.” A media stink was made about how Castro and the Cuban delegation plucked chickens in their room at the Theresa. Harlemites savored every minute of it.
September 24, 2007 at 6:39 pm
Let’s face it – the U.S. has never really cared for this freedom of speech thing. We love to talk about it, but anytime anyone really exercises it (MoveOn), they catch hell.
I was watching Democracy Now! with Amy Goodman tonight – they had Alan Greenspan on, of all people (must have been a booking mistake on his part). They grilled him pretty good, like he would never get in mainstream media. Very entertaining – they asked him about the missing $8 billion in currency that went to Iraq. He had never heard the story! He said it must have something to do with the Iraqi dinars are worth so much less than dollars. They must have confused dollars and dinars. That’s what he said!
September 25, 2007 at 10:05 am
Oh yeah, Ahmadinejad’s visit to Columbia was quite a propaganda coup for the Bush Administration and the Evil Right. Looks like war for sure, now!
I have only one question, Mark: How did the Bush Administration and the Evil Right get all those lefties at Columbia to spew such hatred toward Iran and Iran’s president?
September 25, 2007 at 10:39 am
[Update]
I see Congress has just passed a bill by a 397-16 vote to impose more sanctions on Iran. And the bill was proposed by a Democrat. Wow. It seems everybody is listening to that rightwing talk radio. Even Hugo Chavez will be bailing out of Iran pretty soon!
September 25, 2007 at 11:01 am
The above commenter, “Gogoin”, is actually KARL DF, who comes here under many names, and even, if only rarely, puts up something thoughtful. At another thread this AM, he is “Carol”. Apparently he’s got some closet issues going on.
And Carol, if you read anything here, you would know what high regard I hold Democrats in.
There’s a corrupt regime in Saudi Arabia that beheads people and allows women no rights, who has a royal family that steals their wealth, who gets only silence in this country. There’s a thug in Pakistan that we support. It is only countries that we want to attack that receive our righteous indignation. It’s utter hypocrisy. The right wing in this country does not care about human rights. Only power.
September 25, 2007 at 12:31 pm
We (all of us) are still waiting to hear your explanation for the torrent of leftwing invective directed at the Iranian president, when, according to you, it was supposed to be a torrent of rightwing invective. Or has another one of your conspiracy theories bit the dust?
September 25, 2007 at 12:34 pm
Carol: Read the opening lines of the post:
I await your explanation for why Iran is a bad guy, Saudi Arabia a good guy, when the latter has a much worse human rights record, allows no elections, doesn’t allow women to show their faces, and plays ball with the US …
oh, wait. I got it.
September 26, 2007 at 8:45 am
[...] 26th, 2007 In a post down below, I questioned the accuracy of a translation of a quotation by Iranian President Ahmadinejad in [...]