A Not-So-Simple Woman
September 3, 2007
I was deeply moved to learn that Mother Theresa was plagued by doubt, that her faith was not so simple as that sweet face led us to believe. A new book, “Mother Teresa: Come Be My Light” will be released tomorrow. It is a collection of letters written to colleagues and superiors over 66 years. It’s a revealing glimpse into her soul.
In a 1953 letter she says
Please pray specially for me that I may not spoil His work and that Our Lord may show Himself — for there is such terrible darkness within me, as if everything was dead. It has been like this more or less from the time I started the work.
Her doubt spanned decades. This is from 1979:
Jesus has a very special love for you. As for me, the silence and the emptiness is so great that I look and do not see, listen and do not hear.
There is so much going on with this complex woman, so many avenues to pursue. Was she willing herself to faith? Is that even possible? Was her charitable work a result of religious belief, or was some other force guiding her?
I am no philosopher, and cannot deal in such abstractions as the existence of a Supreme Being. I come from a religious background, but abandoned it in my 38th year. I am not plagued by doubt, as she was. Nor do I bask in certainty. I simply accept that I cannot know some things, and that is enough. If I was meant to believe in God, at some point he would have revealed something to me indicating that he is there in the shadows. But he either very cagey or he isn’t there or he simply doesn’t care. Pick ‘em.
I have two older brothers who are deeply religious – one is a Catholic priest, the other a devout practitioner. I came from the same household of the same parents, who did not change in the years between our births. I went to Catholic schools, and as a very young child believed as I was taught. I remember one Christmas Eve as I sat in church for midnight mass. I had been fasting, as we were taught to do, and my stomach hurt. But I believed with childish innocence that when I went to communion Jesus would enter my stomach and make the pain go away. I had no doubt.
But it did not happen. Here I am 57 years old, and I remember that night as a boy of seven years sitting there with a tummy ache that did not go away. It was likely the origin of doubt.
Doubt is a powerful motivating force, more useful to us perhaps than religion itself. New science comes about because of Young Turks who doubt their elders. Doubt frees us from oppressive authority, whether it is Holy Mother Church, or the United States of America. Doubt leads the way towards true freedom, a feeling so profoundly moving as to rival romantic love itself.
Those brief snippets evidencing Mother Theresa’s doubt speak of a travesty – a woman imprisoned not by belief, but by a need to believe. She could not be free. But maybe that doesn’t matter – maybe we function better as slaves, maybe we were not meant to be free. Without the slavery of the mind we could have no ideologies, armies, or countries. (♫And no religion too.♫)
It would be a different world. Maybe a better one. Who really knows?
September 3, 2007 at 2:42 pm
Nice commentary, Mark. I too was struck by the doubt expressed by Mother Teresa in her letters. For me, at age 67 and counting, it appears that we create division in our lives via the process of thinking about ourselves and life as objects. We differentiate. We exclude. We divide. And we then try to conquer. Dictionaries say that life is a noun. I have tended to experience it as a verb. Mother Teresa evidently wanted “living proof” that her religious belief was “true.” Again, that may be because we have all been taught that truth is a noun. I believe truth is another verb.
September 3, 2007 at 5:28 pm
I’m having trouble with that – that you just said. It’s a bit opaque for me. perhaps I am too literate. I think I can grasp “truth is another verb”, in that the concept of final knowledge of anything is slippery as to be useless. As a friend used to say (constantly), “one thing for sure, nothin’s for sure”.
I am happy to see in Mother Theresa that simple honesty that her face conveyed. Christopher Hitchens attempted to bring her down – “The Missionary Position”, talking about some of her misdeeds, like taking money from Papa Doc Duvalier – that only tells me that she did not have much of a grasp of politics. It’s not a fatal flaw.
September 3, 2007 at 7:16 pm
Literacy is precisely the issue, I believe. The fact that you express happiness “to see in Mother Teresa that simple honesty that her face conveyed” is a preliterate verbal “truth” that she indeed was very human and very much alive. None of us would have guessed, looking at the simple honesty in her face, that Mother Teresa was riddled with doubt and pain about her faith.
Mother Teresa’s compassion was real. Her face and actions tell us that. Modern religious dogma is a product of literacy, however. Some part of Mother Teresa apparently believed that her faith had to be “proven” as “truth” or “fact” in some literal way by a personal visit from God. People who believe that the Bible is literal are often conflicted when seas don’t part and doves don’t land on their heads as signs that they have been blessed. Such belief has nothing to do with Mother Teresa’s formidable human life.
September 4, 2007 at 8:28 am
Perhaps this is why people look so hard for ’signs’ from God, since he seems unwilling to do any direct communication. People flock to see a window on a building in Florida that shows the Virgin Mary and read religious words in the seeds of a green pepper. David Koresh was looking for a sign, perhaps not reading enough into the bullet hole in his belly.
It is so much easier simply to not believe. Saves time too.
September 4, 2007 at 8:36 pm
[...] has an excellent post about the recent revelations about Mother Teresa’s faith over at PoM. Despite the typical [...]
September 4, 2007 at 10:27 pm
Can we compare what Mother Teresa said to that of Jesus, who while dieing on the cross said,”My God, my God, why has thou forsaken me?”
September 5, 2007 at 1:12 am
Mr Swede, sir! Of course, Mother Teresa’s question is the same as Jesus on the cross. Mother Teresa strove continuously to live the literal life of the Gospel Jesus, Thomas a Kempis and her namesake Therese of Lisieux, who also believed in the literal (i.e. literary) gospel of “Jesus the Christ.” Mother Teresa’s open heart and life-sustaining doubt will remain forever beautiful because of her self-endowed human “works.”
September 5, 2007 at 7:37 am
The words supposedly spoken by Jesus on the cross represent some of the finest writing of all time, one of the reasons the Bible survives for centuries. Here we have the Son himself on a suicidal and ill-defined mission, yet full of doubt. What are they saying to us? It is a complex message, one that true believers usually ignore because of its implications.
September 7, 2007 at 11:45 am
Dear People:
The public response to the “revelation” that Mother Theresa was subject to doubts and long periods of spiritual dryness says more about the spiritual state of our culture than it does about her. People nowadays can’t understand why she would remain a Catholic if she wasn’t “getting off” on it. Where’s the euphoria? Where’s the payoff? If Catholicism was such a “downer” for her, why didn’t she just move on? The idea of suffering for one’s Beloved (human or Divine!) as being a high privilege is meaningless to such people.
(Remember Don Novello’s character of Guido Sarducci, gossip columnist for La Osservatore Romano on Saturday Night Live? In one of his sketches he talked about a plan to remove the cross from Catholic churches because “the logo is a downer.” I’m not sure people could understand the humor of that today.)
It may be that God was calling Mother Theresa, who in “natural” terms was a “cataphatic” contemplative, subject to visions and auditions and sensible consolations, to a different vocation: that of the apophatic contemplative, who encounters God in the barrenness, mortification and dark night of all the faculties of the soul — until he or she learns that the feeling of God’s absence is the very SIGN of His presence. And she may not have fully understood everything that such a call might entail.
We mustn’t forget that Christ felt abandoned by God too: “My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me?” Clearly he never doubted God’s existence; atheists never feel “abandoned by God.” And I’m sure that Mother Theresa never doubted His existence either; she simply mourned His felt absence, like John of the Cross, and Rumi, and so many other mystics always have. So what else is new? What else is new is that people are clueless nowadays about the fundamentals of the spiritual life.
Sincerely,
Charles Upton
cupton@qx.net