Faith Without Knowledge
March 14, 2007
We’re not just talking about basic intelligence here, folks. We’re talking about knowledge of one’s own faith, which seems to be sorely lacking in this country.
This certainly doesn’t qualify as a scientific study, but it’s still interesting and indicative of a nasty problem in this country. CNN interviewed a bunch of people and found that most simply don’t know anything about the faith they pretend to practice:
CHETRY: Well, as the Sam Cooke song goes, “Don’t know much about history,” the same could be said about religion. In a nation where the majority of people say they believe in God, most of us don’t know the specifics, it seems, about religion.
According to the new book “Religious Literacy,” Americans are shockingly ignorant about the bible, or any other holy book, for that matter. Its author says that one out of 10 Americans thinks that Joan of Arc was Noah’s wife. So — that was only one out of 10 — all right.
So, did — we did our own test. We wanted to see if anyone knew who wrote the gospels.
(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)
UNIDENTIFIED MALE: Michael, maybe? Right?
UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: I mean, I know then, but I just can’t name them all.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE: OK. I can’t do it.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE: All right.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE: So that’s what I meant, like gospel writers… don’t know.
(END VIDEO CLIP)
CHETRY: Delia Gallagher is CNN’s faith and values correspondent.
Now, I thought that one was pretty easy. For the record, tell us.
DELIA GALLAGHER, CNN FAITH AND VALUES CORRESPONDENT: I thought it was pretty easy, too.
For the record, they’re Matthew, Mark, Luke and John, but surprisingly it was the question that most people had difficulty with, Kiran.
CHETRY: All right. So what were some of the other findings, Delia, about — because the vast majority of people asked say they are religious, and many Christians don’t necessarily know the specifics of the bible.
GALLAGHER: Yes. Well, you know, a lot of people will say they believe, and they are Christian, and they are practicing, but when it comes to really knowing your bible or even knowing about other religions, we found that a lot of people don’t have a great breadth of knowledge about their history and their religious history.
This is amazing. For a country that seems to be bursting at the seams with people who know everything about Islam (for instance,those who would tell you that Islam’s “over-reaching goal” is to take over the world, and that such things are ”in the Qu’ran…”), people sure don’t seem to know much about Christianity.
I swear to God, it’s like we’re picking sides in some kind of football game. No one quite knows anything about the team they’re cheering for, they just know that their team is somehow better than the other one.
March 14, 2007 at 10:10 pm
The thing you are neglecting to take into account is that several major Christian religions prefer their members NOT read the bible. This is not due to any major conspiracy or anything. It is just that they feel a casual familiarity with the book will create confusion and wrong or shallow thinking.
It happens frequently. People make assumptions without any background in the time and situation influencing the writing. The Gospels and Epistles were letters sent to specific communities. They were not collected into any semblance of a book like the bible until the Council of Nicea some 500 years after the death of Christ and well after the pagan, Constantine, significantly changed the Christian faith–melding it with many pagan rites. The thrust of each piece was influenced by what was going on in Corinth (Epistle: Corinthians) or Ephesus (Epistle: Ephesians), or influenced by specific interests of the author (Luke was a physician and his Gospel has a predilection towards the physical).
It was also influenced by what the culture was like in Palestine and by the political temperament of the time. Women, for instance, were considered worth less than cows. They could be divorced by the man saying, “I divorce you.” and women were the only ones stoned in adultery cases. So when Mathew wrote, ‘For this reason a man will leave his father and mother and will be united with his wife, and the two will become one flesh’ this was revolutionary stuff. Women were being put in a position equal to man. Today we look at that and say “Wow! That’s mighty restrictive.”
Also–for most of my life, anyway–the Bibles available were translated from the Latin Vulgate. That language has about 500 words. It was basically a pigeon and totally unsuited to such specificity. 40 years ago there was a pretty valid reason to keep biblical information from the masses.
Today, with the more accurate translations, we don’t have that particular worry, but the others still stand. Yes, I’ve read the bible–5 times so far–but the piecemeal way that most Christians learn about the Bible make it unlikely that they are getting any real information from it. Don’t look just to the people who have been ignoring the Book, most of those that read it don’t know it either.
March 14, 2007 at 10:20 pm
Perhaps this reveals that knowledge about Islam is at the same level as knowledge about Christianity.
What is interesting is that they did not interview Americans of other faiths.
March 14, 2007 at 11:34 pm
[...] Seriously. It’s pretty damn sad. [...]
March 15, 2007 at 5:08 am
that was very surprising to know!